Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:36
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is the best AI ChatGPT or Copilot, Cursor, Grok?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
How do you think Trump's tariff threats are affecting Europe?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Volcanic gold discovered in Hawaii may have come directly from Earth's core - Earth.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Bacteria living in your gut may cause depression, not your brain, says a new study - Earth.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why do you think Democrat favorability ratings are so low?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How do you deal with neighbors who are always telling you what to do?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Whitesides says budget proposal shows the administration does not value NASA science - SpaceNews